The Soapbox

Hoodafan

Joined: 09/29/2013 Posts: 60830
Likes: 57465


Oh that article was horrendous and painful to read.


My guess was the $20K threshold, especially when combined with the number of transactions, was intended to catch the bigger fish and serial tax frauds, that maybe use Venmo to pay a bunch of vendors/subcontractors with no intention of ever filing a 1099. Like a contractor that pays his subs that way all year, but never pays them over the $10K bank reporting requirements in one payment, and never files any 1099's. Or the hairdresser, baby sitter, etc. that makes plenty of money, but is paid by a bunch of individuals (rather than by a business required to file 1099's), and never reports the income. Both of those examples could easily hit the $20K and transaction threshold, and would be worth the "squeeze" to go after.

Yes, there's a lot of gap between $600 and $20K, but that $20K is total for the year. How much squeeze are we going to put into going after folks getting less than $20K? Not like they'll be paying taxes on that. (yes, I realize that's only one type of payment, and that it could be above some even sizable taxable income)

(In response to this post by Beerman)

Posted: 01/12/2022 at 4:32PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Democrats doing their best to destroy venmo -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 12:28PM
  Venmo can’t tell what is commercial or not -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 5:23PM
  So because irs already has crappy policies in place -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 5:50PM
  No you have to be able to account for what’s reported -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 6:20PM
  Have you ever been audited? ** -- SixerHoo 01/12/2022 6:21PM
  Yes -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 6:22PM
  Probably should avoid shady tax claims then. ** -- SixerHoo 01/12/2022 6:24PM
  I remember once they garnished my dads wages -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 6:59PM
  You are so dumb. ** -- HooAskedYou 01/12/2022 1:55PM
  🎣 ** -- HoodatB 01/12/2022 1:59PM
  Well -- Beerman 01/12/2022 3:36PM
  I would agree -- Beerman 01/12/2022 4:13PM
  You know, Hooda... -- Beerman 01/12/2022 4:42PM
  Can you link your data to where -- HoodatB 01/12/2022 2:25PM
  Like dumb and dumber ** -- Hoo TV 01/12/2022 2:04PM
  You mean “the law” right? ** -- HoodatB 01/12/2022 12:45PM
  Yeah, $600 is probably too low, but I love this quote -- BocaHoo91 01/12/2022 12:56PM
  No, another example -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 12:53PM
  Not true. You are so dumb. ** -- HooAskedYou 01/12/2022 1:56PM
  YET AGAIN YOU ARE AN IDIOT… -- HoodatB 01/12/2022 1:34PM
  Again in your link -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 5:57PM
  ^^^ Ignoramus Kazanskus ^^^ ** -- TomGlansAski 01/12/2022 12:37PM
  You tell em there Scrotum ** -- HokieDan95 01/12/2022 12:44PM
  Let's go Danny! ** -- TomGlansAski 01/12/2022 12:49PM
  Are you defending a person complaining about -- HoodatB 01/12/2022 12:46PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307